Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
3.5 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
3.5 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
3.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
4.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
3.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 15.0 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The associate editor had trouble getting people to agree to be reviewers which explains the long waiting time. The review process moved forward after numerous emails to the editor-in-chief. Even though the paper was rejected, the high quality reviews were very helpful. One of the reviewers also corrected the typos and language style.