Latest review
First review round: 6.8 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good).
Outcome: Rejected.
Motivation:
Handling was ok. Both reviews were short, one 331 words, the other just one sloppy sentence, even without caring for correct grammar. While the first addressed some minor and one major point and not conluding a decision, the second was an advice against publication but with a ridiculously superficial discussion.
The editor did not explain the decision. I would wish that such reviews as #2 are rejected by editors, however the editorial process was okay.
