Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
10.7 weeks
20.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2024
Motivation:
I received a very extensive review. In both round 1 and round 2, the reviewers worked relatively quickly, especially considering the very lengthy paper. The editor's handling of the process was excellent at all times and provided optimal support. Although it was a very demanding and time-consuming process, I am completely satisfied with the procedures and the editorial team of the journal.
6.8 weeks
6.8 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2020
Motivation:
Handling was ok. Both reviews were short, one 331 words, the other just one sloppy sentence, even without caring for correct grammar. While the first addressed some minor and one major point and not conluding a decision, the second was an advice against publication but with a ridiculously superficial discussion.
The editor did not explain the decision. I would wish that such reviews as #2 are rejected by editors, however the editorial process was okay.
The editor did not explain the decision. I would wish that such reviews as #2 are rejected by editors, however the editorial process was okay.