Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
2.3 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
3.5 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.0 / 5.0 (moderate)
Average number of review reports
12.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
4.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
4.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 11.1 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
There were four reviewers. One recommended a “Minor Revision,” while three recommended a “Major Revision.” The process went back and forth between “In Peer Review” and “Required Review Completed” several times, and the first round of peer review took a very long time. The comments ranged from simple content to issues requiring additional experiments.