Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
5.5 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
5.5 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
1.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
1.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
0.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 24.0 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
A well-executed paper review benefits authors, even if the reviewed paper is ultimately rejected. Authors can use the feedback to improve their work and submit it to other journals. In my experience, a single reviewer mostly focused on grammatical and compositional flaws rather than methodological or theoretical problems in the article.