Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
12.7 weeks
16.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2026
Motivation:
The editor provided prompt responses to the authors’ questions, while the reviewer offered constructive feedback that improved the manuscript’s clarity and readability.
24.0 weeks
24.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2023
Motivation:
A well-executed paper review benefits authors, even if the reviewed paper is ultimately rejected. Authors can use the feedback to improve their work and submit it to other journals. In my experience, a single reviewer mostly focused on grammatical and compositional flaws rather than methodological or theoretical problems in the article.