Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
2.4 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
3.1 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.5 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.0 / 5.0 (moderate)
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
5.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
5.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 10.3 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
The experience was very good. The editor maintains good communication with the authors and helps with any questions you may have. It was also clear that the invited reviewers were experts in the field and, of course, their comments were valuable in improving the paper. Despite being a Q4 journal, it is a good option to consider for publication.