Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
10.3 weeks
14.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2025
Motivation: The experience was very good. The editor maintains good communication with the authors and helps with any questions you may have. It was also clear that the invited reviewers were experts in the field and, of course, their comments were valuable in improving the paper. Despite being a Q4 journal, it is a good option to consider for publication.
10.4 weeks
12.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2025
Motivation: The editor is very attentive and responds quickly to queries. In addition, I believe that the reviewers selected were experienced in the subject matter and their comments were helpful. Overall, the time from submission to publication is within the normal range.