Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
n/a
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
n/a
Decision time immediate rejection
106 days
Average number of review rounds
n/a
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
n/a

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
n/a
Overall rating manuscript handling
n/a

Latest review

Outcome: Rejected (im.).

Motivation:
It took more than 3 months to get this feedback on the article : "Thank you for submitting your manuscript. All new submissions are given a preliminary review by the editors to evaluate whether the subject matter and general content are appropriate for this journal. Unfortunately, the editors were of the opinion that the topic covered in your manuscript is outside the scope of this journal and are better suited for a journal that publishes papers in that area." Usually I get this kind of feedback one ore two days after having submitted the article. I can't imagine why it took so long with this journal. I hope other scholars won't waste their time with this journal.