Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
106 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2013
Motivation:
It took more than 3 months to get this feedback on the article : "Thank you for submitting your manuscript. All new submissions are given a
preliminary review by the editors to evaluate whether the subject matter and
general content are appropriate for this journal.
Unfortunately, the editors were of the opinion that the topic covered in
your manuscript is outside the scope of this journal and are better suited
for a journal that publishes papers in that area."
Usually I get this kind of feedback one ore two days after having submitted the article. I can't imagine why it took so long with this journal. I hope other scholars won't waste their time with this journal.
preliminary review by the editors to evaluate whether the subject matter and
general content are appropriate for this journal.
Unfortunately, the editors were of the opinion that the topic covered in
your manuscript is outside the scope of this journal and are better suited
for a journal that publishes papers in that area."
Usually I get this kind of feedback one ore two days after having submitted the article. I can't imagine why it took so long with this journal. I hope other scholars won't waste their time with this journal.