Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
2.1 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
3.3 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.7 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
2.6 / 5.0 (moderate)
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
3.9 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
3.1 / 5.0

Latest review

Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Accepted (im.).

Motivation:
My manuscript was previously rejected after reviews from Proceedings A, mainly for 'being too broad' with an option to transfer to RSOS. After transfering, we received 'Accept as is' decision almost immediately, which makes it hard to believe the manuscript was looked at again, which matters because we have made some substantial changes in the manuscript between the rejection and resubmission to RSOS (which we highlighted in the Cover Letter). Apart from that, the process has been pleasant.
3.1
Good process
9 reviews
Space for journal cover image
Journal homepage

Disciplines

General

Related journals

Nature Science PNAS