The Review of Symbolic Logic

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of The Review of Symbolic Logic has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor
Disciplines: Mathematics, Philosophy

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 1 review)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 6.7 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 6.7 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 2.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments n/a compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

First review round: 29.0 weeks. Overall rating: 2 (moderate). Outcome: Rejected.

Reviewer 1 was clearly into my field, and gave me a "Revise and Resubmit" with some precious suggestions. As for Reviewer 2 instead, who suggested "Reject", s/he seemed not to be really into my field (or s/he seemed to follow a, say, competing school within the same field). S/he suggested me to take into account theories which have little or nothing to do with the one I investigated in my paper, and made some assertions without justifying them. Also, her/his observations went not beyond page 7 (over 32), which suggests that s/he made very little effort to understand the content of the paper (s/he said that some definitions were unclear, but in reality they were formulated in a way which is standard in the field).