Reviews for "The Review of Symbolic Logic"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
The Review of Symbolic Logic | 29.0 weeks |
29.0 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 2 (moderate) |
2 (moderate) |
Rejected |
Motivation: Reviewer 1 was clearly into my field, and gave me a "Revise and Resubmit" with some precious suggestions. As for Reviewer 2 instead, who suggested "Reject", s/he seemed not to be really into my field (or s/he seemed to follow a, say, competing school within the same field). S/he suggested me to take into account theories which have little or nothing to do with the one I investigated in my paper, and made some assertions without justifying them. Also, her/his observations went not beyond page 7 (over 32), which suggests that s/he made very little effort to understand the content of the paper (s/he said that some definitions were unclear, but in reality they were formulated in a way which is standard in the field). |