Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
2.3 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
5.2 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.8 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.3 / 5.0 (moderate)
Average number of review reports
1.8 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
3.5 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
3.5 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 7.6 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
The review process was very smooth and the reviewers really contributed to the improvement of the paper. The only criticism I have is that in the second round of revisions, one reviewer criticized an addition that the other reviewer asked. So the editor could have intervened in this case to settle the situation before getting the reviews back to the authors. Other than that, I really appreciated the review process and the quality of the reviews.
3.5
Very good process
4 reviews
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines

Education Library

Related journals

Communication Teacher Studies in Second Language Acquisition Annals of Dyslexia