Reviews for "PLoS Computational Biology"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| PLoS Computational Biology | 7.9 weeks |
13.6 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Rejected |
| PLoS Computational Biology | n/a | n/a | 6.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
| PLoS Computational Biology | n/a | n/a | 63.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
| Motivation: Waiting time too long for rejection without proofreading | |||||||
| PLoS Computational Biology | 5.0 weeks |
12.0 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
| PLoS Computational Biology | 12.0 weeks |
14.0 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 3 (good) |
2 (moderate) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: The overall process was very slow. | |||||||
| PLoS Computational Biology | Drawn back before first editorial decision after 66 days | Drawn back | |||||
| PLoS Computational Biology | n/a | n/a | 7.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
| PLoS Computational Biology | 10.8 weeks |
12.8 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
@scirev