Physical Review A

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Physical Review A has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 3 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 1.0 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 1.8 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 3 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 1.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.5 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.5 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 4.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 3.5 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

Outcome: Rejected (im.).

The editor wrote that "they accept only papers that are scientifically sound, important to the field, and contain significant new results in physics. We judge that these acceptance criteria are not met by your manuscript". I am sure that he did not see the paper carefully and did not understand the novelty of our work. Our work was soon accepted in other peer-reviewd journal and was significantly cited after publication. More surprisingly, the work based on our model was recently published in Physical Review A. So I did not understand that why our work was not significant and how similar kind of work was publishable in PRA later?