Latest review
First review round: 8.7 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad).
Outcome: Rejected.
Motivation:
While the referee was extremely positive, the editor decided to reject anyway (apparently the article was just not to her taste). This has happened a number of times for the journal and it makes me not want to referee for them - if the editor is going to make a decision that overturns that of the referee anyway, what's the point?