Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.7 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
0
Rejected
2017
Motivation: While the referee was extremely positive, the editor decided to reject anyway (apparently the article was just not to her taste). This has happened a number of times for the journal and it makes me not want to referee for them - if the editor is going to make a decision that overturns that of the referee anyway, what's the point?
n/a
n/a
20 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
17.1 weeks
24.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Rejected
2016
8.6 weeks
8.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
5
Rejected
2016
Motivation: It didn't take long. The referee raised some important objections to my argument.
3.3 weeks
3.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
2
3
Rejected
2011
n/a
n/a
10 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2013