Journal info (provided by editor)

Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
Immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
0.6 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
0.6 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Overall rating manuscript handling
3.0 / 5.0

Characteristics of peer review process

Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
3.0 reports
Quality of review reports
3.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 5.1 weeks. Overall rating: 2 (moderate). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
Two Referees recommended revision. The third one commented "Mechanism is speculative" To some extent all mechanisms are speculative! The advantage of using staring material was overlooked by referee. He wrote following Significance: Average (not suitable for Organometallics) Novelty: Average (not suitable for Organometallics) Broad Interest: Average (not suitable for Organometallics) Has excellent/average to be interpretted seperately for each journal