Review this journal

Organometallics

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 2 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 0.6 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 0.6 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 3.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments n/a compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 3.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 5.1 weeks. Overall rating: 2 (moderate). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
Two Referees recommended revision. The third one commented "Mechanism is speculative" To some extent all mechanisms are speculative! The advantage of using staring material was overlooked by referee. He wrote following Significance: Average (not suitable for Organometallics) Novelty: Average (not suitable for Organometallics) Broad Interest: Average (not suitable for Organometallics) Has excellent/average to be interpretted seperately for each journal

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Organometallics has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.