Reviews for "Organometallics"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Organometallics 5.1
weeks
5.1
weeks
n/a 3 2
(moderate)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
Motivation: Two Referees recommended revision. The third one commented "Mechanism is speculative" To some extent all mechanisms are speculative! The advantage of using staring material was overlooked by referee. He wrote following
Significance: Average (not suitable for Organometallics)
Novelty: Average (not suitable for Organometallics)
Broad Interest: Average (not suitable for Organometallics)
Has excellent/average to be interpretted seperately for each journal
Organometallics 0.3
weeks
0.3
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: estions were made