Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
1.6 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
1.6 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
1.5 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
0.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
0.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 8.0 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The review process, spanning two months, culminated in just one reviewer's comment, which recommended rejection. The brevity of the feedback and its content suggested a lack of understanding of the manuscript's field, making for a discouraging review experience. It is advisable not to submit to this journal based on this experience.