Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.0 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2024
Motivation:
The review process, spanning two months, culminated in just one reviewer's comment, which recommended rejection. The brevity of the feedback and its content suggested a lack of understanding of the manuscript's field, making for a discouraging review experience. It is advisable not to submit to this journal based on this experience.
6.1 weeks
6.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2022
Motivation:
Totally useless reviews. One of the reviewers was obviously out of topic, and the second one wrote only one sentence that the paper would be better for a veterinary journal. I can't believe that the editor's decision was based on these poor reviews. Very unprofessional, and I will never submit to this journal again.