Journal info (provided by editor)

Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
Immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
12.0 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
12.0 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Overall rating manuscript handling
0.0 / 5.0

Characteristics of peer review process

Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
1.0 reports
Quality of review reports
0.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 52.1 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
My manuscript remained under review for almost one year, during which the journal invited more than 110 reviewers but failed to secure the required peer reviews. Eventually, the paper was rejected solely due to the inability to obtain reviewers, despite no scientific evaluation. This prolonged delay significantly harmed the novelty and timely dissemination of the research, and the editorial process was highly unsatisfactory.