Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
5.7 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
9.2 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.5 / 5.0 (difficult)
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
4.5 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
5.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 27.4 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
This was a pleasant experience at all stages of the publication process. The reviews were elaborate, and one of the reviewers suggested a reference giving a missing link between the newly introduced notions and the known ones; this was what the author has been searching for many years. In the final stage, the corrected proofs (galleys) were provided for checking (after processing the uncorrected proofs), for the first time in the whole author's career. It was nice to have an opportunity to check that all the corrections have been properly incorporated.