Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
27.4 weeks
36.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2023
Motivation:
This was a pleasant experience at all stages of the publication process. The reviews were elaborate, and one of the reviewers suggested a reference giving a missing link between the newly introduced notions and the known ones; this was what the author has been searching for many years. In the final stage, the corrected proofs (galleys) were provided for checking (after processing the uncorrected proofs), for the first time in the whole author's career. It was nice to have an opportunity to check that all the corrections have been properly incorporated.
22.0 weeks
43.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2022
Motivation:
This was really a remarkable experience. The received reviews were of high quality and helped to improve the paper. In particular, incorporating reviewers' remarks has required to change the structure of the paper, which has made it more readable. The whole publication process was unexpectedly fast for a mathematical paper.