Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
3.0 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
4.2 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.0 / 5.0 (moderate)
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
5.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
5.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 13.1 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
It was an outstanding experience. One of the two reviews reported an inaccuracy overlooked by the authors. The second review suggested adding an entire section, which has increased the paper's value. The editors performed style and language editing with great accuracy and care for the authors' original message. It is the first time the authors have experienced such responsible editing. The content of the paper was a bit too complicated for a popular science journal, and all participants of the process tried their best to make it more accessible.