Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
13.1 weeks
18.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2024
Motivation: It was an outstanding experience. One of the two reviews reported an inaccuracy overlooked by the authors. The second review suggested adding an entire section, which has increased the paper's value. The editors performed style and language editing with great accuracy and care for the authors' original message. It is the first time the authors have experienced such responsible editing. The content of the paper was a bit too complicated for a popular science journal, and all participants of the process tried their best to make it more accessible.