Review this journal

Landscape and Urban Planning

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 5 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 4.0 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 10.6 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 7 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 3.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.3 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.3 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 4.3 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 1.3 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 15.4 weeks. Overall rating: 2 (moderate). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
After submitting the revised version in November 2013, we got contacted by the journal on 15-01-2014. The editor had noted that a large portion of reviewer 1's comments were excluded from the decicision letter of 31-08-2013. He attached the full comments of reviewer 1 and asked for a detailed response to these comments, as soon as possible. We submitted the second revised version of the paper on 27-01-2014. As such, due to the journal's mismanagement the whole proces lasted at least a few months more. I couldn't specify this particular process in the questions above.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Landscape and Urban Planning has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.