Reviews for "Landscape and Urban Planning"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| Landscape and Urban Planning | 15.4 weeks |
40.0 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
2 (moderate) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: After submitting the revised version in November 2013, we got contacted by the journal on 15-01-2014. The editor had noted that a large portion of reviewer 1's comments were excluded from the decicision letter of 31-08-2013. He attached the full comments of reviewer 1 and asked for a detailed response to these comments, as soon as possible. We submitted the second revised version of the paper on 27-01-2014. As such, due to the journal's mismanagement the whole proces lasted at least a few months more. I couldn't specify this particular process in the questions above. |
|||||||
| Landscape and Urban Planning | 27.0 weeks |
57.6 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
3 (good) |
Accepted |
| Landscape and Urban Planning | n/a | n/a | 7.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
| Landscape and Urban Planning | 17.4 weeks |
17.4 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 2 (moderate) |
0 (very bad) |
Rejected |
| Landscape and Urban Planning | 9.7 weeks |
40.0 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 3 (good) |
0 (very bad) |
Accepted |