Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
1.2 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
1.6 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.3 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
2.0 / 5.0 (easy)
Average number of review reports
2.3 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
4.3 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
4.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 6.0 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
Everyone involved -- editor, reviewers, journal staff -- was professional and helpful. The reviews showed that the reviewers had read the manuscript and looked at the submitted materials carefully; the reviews provided helpful ideas. The editor guided us through the process smoothly. Several times I had to ask the journal's staff for help; I got help quickly. Start to finish (submission to publication of the copyedited version) took just 11 weeks. I was impressed.
4.0
Very good process
4 reviews
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines

Neuroscience

Related journals

Neuron The EMBO Journal Trends in Neurosciences