Journal of Field Robotics

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Journal of Field Robotics has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 2 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 3.5 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 11.6 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 1.5 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 4.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 1.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

First review round: 18.4 weeks. Overall rating: 1 (bad). Outcome: Accepted.

The whole review process took us more than one year, so the paper was published almost two years after the work was performed. Four rounds of revisions were performed with the following results: major changes, minor changes, major changes and acceptance. I can't find the logic when you apply minor changes suggested by reviewers and their next review suggests major changes. Additionally, there were contradictions between the reviewers that the editors did not solve.