Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

Outcome: Rejected (im.).

Motivation:
After almost 50 days from the date of manuscript submission, the editorial office informed me that my manuscript was rejected, actually without obvious reason, just the repeated common words “Although your manuscript falls within the aim and scope of this journal, it is being declined due to lack of sufficient novelty. We receive a much larger number of papers than we are able to accept”. They did not adequately consider the manuscript as evidenced by the lack of reviewers’ comments and the suggestion of submitting my manuscript to another journal which has a scoop completely different from my manuscript scope. The bad thing is that they kept the manuscript for 50 days for nothing, although they claim the Time to First Decision is 11 days.