Review this journal

Biomass and Bioenergy

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 8 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 7.7 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 10.9 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 91 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.4 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.6 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.2 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 3.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 1.6 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 22.4 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
The peer review process was completed in less than two months, I supposed. However the journal was very slow in delivering the feedbacks to the authors, they waited for another reviewer to return the comments which took forever to respond. It ended up that we received 3 comments including one from the editor which mostly on technical parts. The journal is good, but the way they handle the review process could have been better than that.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Biomass and Bioenergy has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.