Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

Outcome: Rejected (im.).

Motivation:
The editorial decision was made without sending the manuscript for peer review. While the communication from the journal was polite, the lack of review process meant there was no substantive feedback on the manuscript. This approach may be discouraging, particularly for early-career researchers, and limits the opportunity to improve the work based on expert input.
4.0
Very good process
Space for journal cover image