Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
3 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2026
Motivation:
The editorial decision was made without sending the manuscript for peer review. While the communication from the journal was polite, the lack of review process meant there was no substantive feedback on the manuscript. This approach may be discouraging, particularly for early-career researchers, and limits the opportunity to improve the work based on expert input.
14.4 weeks
14.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
Fast review process, fair and polite reviewers.