Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
1.1 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
1.4 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
4.0 / 5.0 (difficult)
Average number of review reports
1.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
3.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
3.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 4.6 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
I really liked that the editor in chief was in direct contact with me, informing me of the review and editorial activities. The feedback was quick and I was kept up to date throughout the process. I was expecting to receive the comments of two reviewers rather than one. However, the comments of the reviewer was really constructive and contributed into the quality of my paper.