Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.6 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
3
Accepted
2015
Motivation: I really liked that the editor in chief was in direct contact with me, informing me of the review and editorial activities. The feedback was quick and I was kept up to date throughout the process. I was expecting to receive the comments of two reviewers rather than one. However, the comments of the reviewer was really constructive and contributed into the quality of my paper.