Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
2.5 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
4.6 months
Decision time immediate rejection
58 days
Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.0 / 5.0 (moderate)
Average number of review reports
2.3 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
3.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
2.7 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 13.7 weeks. Overall rating: 1 (bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
Getting rejected after R&R is always painful. This one was particularly painful as one of the reviewers simply stated that the changes were "not sufficient", and the other one was annoyed because they could not find the response letter in the system (in their perspective it "was not provided"). I understand that the editor does not want to decide against two negative evaluations, but it does feel like wasted time and effort for everyone this way.
2.7
Good process
4 reviews
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines

Social sciences Sociology

Related journals

American Behavioral Scientist Business and Society Review Disasters