Review this journal

International Journal of Knowledge Management

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 1 review)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 0.0 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 0.5 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 1.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 3.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 4.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 0.1 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
The EIC is helpful, although his practice may not be generally adopted. A few days after my initial submission, he wrote a fairly long paragraph of constructive feedback asking for my revision but he has made it "rejected" on record. I still submit it again given he explicitly asked me to do so. I addressed the comments accordingly (after a few months as I was working on other papers and there is no given deadline for such "revision"), and then it went through a more usual practice. Both reviewers were very positive. Only minor edits were needed, and my article was accepted very quickly after the 2nd round revision.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of International Journal of Knowledge Management has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.