International Journal of Knowledge Management

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of International Journal of Knowledge Management has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 1 review)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 0.0 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 0.5 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 1.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 3.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 4.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

First review round: 0.1 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted.

The EIC is helpful, although his practice may not be generally adopted. A few days after my initial submission, he wrote a fairly long paragraph of constructive feedback asking for my revision but he has made it "rejected" on record. I still submit it again given he explicitly asked me to do so. I addressed the comments accordingly (after a few months as I was working on other papers and there is no given deadline for such "revision"), and then it went through a more usual practice. Both reviewers were very positive. Only minor edits were needed, and my article was accepted very quickly after the 2nd round revision.