Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Computers and Electronics in Agriculture has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 4 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 2.5 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 4.8 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 5 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.5 compare →
Quality of review reports 4.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 3.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 3.5 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

First review round: 3.7 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Rejected.

Reviewers had generic criticism about the fact that other authors (they name them, but they do not point to specific papers) already addressed the same problem. Not pointing out any specific paper is very annoying because of course authors are convinced that there are differences w.r.t. literature work. Just saying that other authors worked in the same area or the same problem without the possibility to verify it is not enough. Other criticism was ok in the sense that they required further experiments and practical validation. However, saying that what is proposed cannot be implemented in practice in a straightforward way is again generic without pointing out any specific concern about the transferrability of the result in the real world.