Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
2.1 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
2.4 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.3 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.0 / 5.0 (moderate)
Average number of review reports
3.3 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
2.3 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
1.7 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 12.6 weeks. Overall rating: 1 (bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The reviewers did not understand the work. Instead instead of declaring this, they based their arguments in impressions and declared that they did not believe some of the results. Those results were based on published and well-known theoretical tools. I could not answer to them to proof the validity of the work as it was rejected