Reviews for "International Journal of Food Microbiology"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
International Journal of Food Microbiology 12.6
weeks
12.6
weeks
n/a 3 1
(bad)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: The reviewers did not understand the work. Instead instead of declaring this, they based their arguments in impressions and declared that they did not believe some of the results. Those results were based on published and well-known theoretical tools.
I could not answer to them to proof the validity of the work as it was rejected
International Journal of Food Microbiology 9.0
weeks
10.3
weeks
n/a 4 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
International Journal of Food Microbiology 6.0
weeks
6.0
weeks
n/a 3 2
(moderate)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: One reviewer made multiple unprofessional comments that were many times scientifically incorrect and advised to reject. The second reviewer described the paper as "well-written" and asked for minor revisions. The third reviewer also requested only specific revisions. The editors comments referred only to the first reviewers "strongly suggested rejection" opinion and rejected the manuscript based on this with no option of providing a rebuttal against the incorrect claims and statements or opportunity to revise.