Review this journal

Information Processing and Management

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 2 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 5.9 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 5.9 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 2.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments n/a compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 7.6 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Rejected.

Both reviewers provided enough arguments for rejection but one of them added some extra points which were simply false - exposing that he actually never read the paper completely. Strangely enough, he was the one stating that re-submission must be encouraged. It was clear from the feedback that both reviewers were not reading the paper carefully. Some remarks could be interpreted as result of my confusing style, but for some other I couldn't find any other explanation than careless reading. On the other hand, both have provided more than few constructive suggestions, improvement proposals & etc., together with few strong objections against publication that I do agree with.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Information Processing and Management has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.