Reviews for "Information Processing and Management"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Information Processing and Management n/a n/a 3.0
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: I have send three manuscripts till now to this journal and the editor response very quickly within 1-4 days if it is desk rejected. Even though I made the structural changes in abstract, references and all send the manuscript again as a new submission stil the editor rejected it without sending it to the authors.
Information Processing and Management 7.6
n/a 2 2
Motivation: Both reviewers provided enough arguments for rejection but one of them added some extra points which were simply false - exposing that he actually never read the paper completely. Strangely enough, he was the one stating that re-submission must be encouraged. It was clear from the feedback that both reviewers were not reading the paper carefully. Some remarks could be interpreted as result of my confusing style, but for some other I couldn't find any other explanation than careless reading. On the other hand, both have provided more than few constructive suggestions, improvement proposals & etc., together with few strong objections against publication that I do agree with.
Information Processing and Management 43.4
n/a 2 2
Drawn back