SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 2 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 1.8 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 3.1 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 16 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 3.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 2.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

Outcome: Rejected (im.).

Motivation:
The decision said that the MS cannot be considered for peer review in its present form, because it does not fit with journal’s format rules. They required reduction in the cited references(from 79 to max50), reduction the number of figures and tables. We thought that such a truncation of reference list and illustration materials would lead to a diminution of the scientific value of the study, so we looked for another journal for the next submission.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of iForest has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.