Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of iForest has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 2 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 1.8 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 3.1 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 16 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 3.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 2.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

Outcome: Rejected (im.).

The decision said that the MS cannot be considered for peer review in its present form, because it does not fit with journal’s format rules. They required reduction in the cited references(from 79 to max50), reduction the number of figures and tables. We thought that such a truncation of reference list and illustration materials would lead to a diminution of the scientific value of the study, so we looked for another journal for the next submission.