Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

First review round: 4.7 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
This is for a review paper and thus I expected a thorough and critival peer review process. However, I found that the discussion with one reviewer turned more and more towards opinion discussion than facts. I feel it would have been the editors job to intervene or position himself.