Journal info (provided by editor)

Issues per year
12
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 1 review)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round n/a compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts n/a compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 1 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports n/a compare →
Average number of review rounds n/a compare →
Quality of review reports n/a compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments n/a compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling n/a compare →

Latest review

Outcome: Rejected (im.).

Motivation:
The manuscript was not reviewed, but checked by someone who decided it unsuitable. In spite of this I think that a rapid response in a respectful letter saved me time enough to send the manuscript to another journal the same day. I don't agree with these methods, but at least they did not cause unnecessary delays.