Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 1 review)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 3.5 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 3.5 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 3.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 4.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments n/a compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 3.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

First review round: 15.0 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Rejected.

The associate editor had trouble getting people to agree to be reviewers which explains the long waiting time. The review process moved forward after numerous emails to the editor-in-chief. Even though the paper was rejected, the high quality reviews were very helpful. One of the reviewers also corrected the typos and language style.