Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
1.3 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
2.5 months
Decision time immediate rejection
60 days
Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.7 / 5.0 (difficult)
Average number of review reports
1.8 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
2.8 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
2.3 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 4.6 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
I rated "3" as apparently the reviews could have taken much longer. They were detailed to the point, for one of them, of being nit-picky. Hopefully they will help us in revising and submitting to a different journal. Given the tenor of the comments, I found a rejection unnecessarily harsh from the editor, but we needn't beg to get it published here.
2.3
Moderate process
5 reviews
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines

Clinical neuroscience Neuroscience

Related journals

Neuron Current Biology Nature Neuroscience