Journal info (provided by editor)

Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
Immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
20.7 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
27.9 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Overall rating manuscript handling
0.0 / 5.0

Characteristics of peer review process

Average number of review rounds
2.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
4.0 / 5.0 (difficult)
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports
Quality of review reports
4.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 89.9 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The communication from the journal was consistently poor. I spent many hours implementing the recommendations from the original review panel, only for my paper to be sent to new reviewers who were not sent an overview of the revisions asked of me. I waited 7 months to receive feedback from the 2 new reviewers, one of whom only provided 3 sentences of feedback. Although the original review process was productive, the second review process was disappointing due to the length of time waited and lack of detail provided.