Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Gender and History has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor
Disciplines: Social sciences, History

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 1 review)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 20.7 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 27.9 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 4.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 4.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 0.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

First review round: 89.9 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

The communication from the journal was consistently poor. I spent many hours implementing the recommendations from the original review panel, only for my paper to be sent to new reviewers who were not sent an overview of the revisions asked of me. I waited 7 months to receive feedback from the 2 new reviewers, one of whom only provided 3 sentences of feedback. Although the original review process was productive, the second review process was disappointing due to the length of time waited and lack of detail provided.